<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shadow Protect 3.0 Ships, a few gotcha&#8217;s to watch out for</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sbs-rocks.com/2007/09/09/shadow-protect-30-ships-a-few-gotchas-to-watch-out-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sbs-rocks.com/2007/09/09/shadow-protect-30-ships-a-few-gotchas-to-watch-out-for/</link>
	<description>Bitzie I started bloggin just for you, http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://blog.sbs-rocks.com/2007/09/09/shadow-protect-30-ships-a-few-gotchas-to-watch-out-for/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sbs-rocks.com/?p=48#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  It looks like the KB934396 hotfix doesn't always resolve the SQL-VDI error issue.  That's unfortunate.

http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs/browse_thread/thread/6db0dea175449445/c66482c91b37841a?hl=en&#38;q=ShadowProtect#</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  It looks like the KB934396 hotfix doesn&#8217;t always resolve the SQL-VDI error issue.  That&#8217;s unfortunate.</p>
<p><a href="http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs/browse_thread/thread/6db0dea175449445/c66482c91b37841a?hl=en&amp;q=ShadowProtect#" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs/browse_thread/thread/6db0dea175449445/c66482c91b37841a?hl=en&amp;q=ShadowProtect#</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
